The Approximation of Integration
True Mean Arterial Pressure is not a simple arithmetic average. It is the integral of the arterial pressure wave over a single cardiac cycle—literally the "Area Under the Curve" (AUC).
The Bedside Short-Cut: MAP ≈ DBP + 1/3(Pulse Pressure)
This formula is an "estimate of an integral." It assumes a specific shape of the pressure wave that only exists at normal heart rates.
Why "Divided by 3"? The Rule of Thirds
The magic number "3" in the denominator comes from the timing of the heart valves.
The Asymmetry of the Heartbeat
Blood flow is pulsatile, but organ perfusion is continuous. The aorta acts as a "Windkessel" (elastic reservoir), storing energy during systole and recoiling during diastole to maintain flow. Because recoil takes longer than ejection, the arteries spend more time draining (diastole) than filling (systole).
The Geometric Reality
If the arterial pressure wave were a perfect square wave (spending equal time at SBP and DBP), a simple average would work. It is not.
The pressure wave rises sharply (systolic upstroke) and falls slowly (diastolic decay). Most of the "time area" is under the diastolic portion of the curve.
Visualizing the Weighting
Imagine the cardiac cycle as 3 units of time. Systole occupies 1 unit. Diastole occupies 2 units. Thus, the average pressure is (1×SBP + 2×DBP) ÷ 3.
When the Formula Fails: Heart Rate Impact
The most common error in clinical practice is blindly trusting this formula in patients with extreme heart rates.
| Condition | Diastolic Weight | Physiological Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Normal Heart Rate | Diastole × 0.66 | At 60-80 bpm, diastole is ~2/3 of the cycle. Standard formula works perfectly. |
| Tachycardia (120 bpm) | Diastole × 0.50 | Diastole shortens dramatically. Standard formula underestimates true MAP. |
| Bradycardia (40 bpm) | Diastole × 0.75 | Diastole lengthens. Standard formula may overestimate true MAP. |
In severe tachycardia (>110 bpm), systole and diastole become nearly equal in duration. The formula should ideally shift to (SBP + DBP) ÷ 2, but monitors rarely adjust for this, leading to calculation errors.
Clinical Implications
Understanding the limitations of the formula changes how you interpret data at the bedside.
Key Takeaways for Clinicians
- The standard formula is an ESTIMATE, not a measurement.
- In Tachycardia: The formula underestimates true perfusion (because diastole is shorter than the formula assumes).
- In Bradycardia: The formula works well, or slightly overestimates.
- Arterial Lines: They do not use this formula. They sample pressure 100+ times per second to calculate the true integral. This is why A-line MAPs often differ from cuff MAPs.
- Wide Pulse Pressure: In elderly patients with stiff arteries, the "Windkessel" effect is lost. The pressure drops faster, meaning the standard formula might overestimate their true organ perfusion.
Summary
Use the formula (SBP + 2DBP)/3 for stable patients with normal heart rates. For unstable, tachycardic, or stiff-artery patients, trust the trend more than the absolute number, or place an arterial line for direct measurement.
Advanced FAQs
- Does arterial stiffness (aging) affect the formula?
- Yes. Stiff arteries recoil faster, causing pressure to drop more quickly during diastole. This means the "area under the curve" is smaller than the formula predicts. The standard formula often OVER-estimates perfusion in elderly patients.
- Why do A-line and Cuff MAPs disagree?
- The cuff uses the oscillating amplitude to estimate MAP directly (often the most accurate cuff parameter), while the formula calculates it from SBP/DBP. The A-line measures the true integral. Disagreement is expected, especially in non-standard physiology.
Hanya untuk profesional medis